Mediator’s Hat: SAG-AFTRA, WGA, and AMPTP strikes and an industry subject to current/constant change and mid- and long-term risk, and risk and change management

Ultimately the SAG-AFTRA and WGA strikes will be resolved and settled. The pressure on the producers is tremendous and will continue to increase the longer that there is no resolution. But the actors, writers, and artists also are at risk. There are significant pay, perhaps residuals, perhaps long-term job security, and perhaps industry or individual economic business viability issues.

A contract of relatively short duration and then with longer term negotiations would be easiest, if the parties will do so in earnest. This is an industry that seems to be in a state of relatively constant significant change and possible disruption risk – AI is only one of the most recent possible disruptors and AI is just getting started – although there might be current efforts to delay AI, I just do not see it as stopping, and any segment of any industry that does temporarily delay AI is at risk from possible other outside existing third party disruptors, or new disruptors. There is risk for everyone who is involved in this industry, both short-term and long-term.

There will be a settlement. But everyone will remain in ongoing future risk – thus, although perhaps difficult to structure, a longer mid-term agreement that also recognizes existing and later new and perhaps unknown changes, risks and disruption in the industry would be best. But for that, there must also be a level of trust – thus, although to a certain extent inevitable, hopefully conduct such as name calling, hyperbole, or argument gimmicks or distortion will be kept to a minimum.

The following is a scan from the SAG-AFTRA website – I am sure that consider of the issues that are involved actually started longer ago (and the Writers Guild strike itself started back on May 2), but four weeks of negotiations is not very long for any of the parties, and they must keep at the efforts to resolve these disputes, as I resume that the parties are in fact doing and are being encouraged:

* * * * *

Thank you for viewing. Please do pass this blog and blog post and information to other people who would be interested as it is only through collaboration and sharing that great things and success are more quickly achieved.

David Tate, Esq. (and inactive CPA)

  • Business litigation and disputes – business, breach of contract/commercial, co-owners, shareholders, investors, founders, workplace and employment, environmental, D&O, governance, boards and committees.
  • Trust, estate and probate court litigation and disputes – trust, estate, probate, elder and dependent abuse, conservatorship, POA, real property, mental health and care, mental capacity, undue influence, conflicts of interest, and contentious administrations.
  • Governance, boards, audit and governance committees, investigations, auditing, ESG, etc.
  • Mediator and facilitating dispute resolution:
    • Trust, estate, probate, conservatorship, elder and dependent abuse, etc.
    • Business, breach of contract/commercial, owner, shareholder, investor, etc.
    • D&O, board, audit and governance committee, accountant and CPA related.
    • Other: workplace and employment, environmental, trade secret.

Remember, every case and situation is different. It is important to obtain and evaluate all of the evidence that is available, and to apply that evidence to the applicable standards and laws. You do need to consult with an attorney and other professionals about your particular situation. This post is not a solicitation for legal or other services inside of or outside of California, and, of course, this post only is a summary of information that changes from time to time, and does not apply to any particular situation or to your specific situation. So . . . you cannot rely on this post for your situation or as legal or other professional advice or representation, or as or for my opinions and views on the subject matter.

Also note – sometimes I include links to or comments about materials from other organizations or people – if I do so, it is because I believe that the materials are worthwhile reading or viewing; however, that does not mean that I do not or that I might not have a different view about some or even all of the subject matter or materials, or that I necessarily agree with, or agree with everything about or relating to, that organization or person, or those materials or the subject matter.

Please also subscribe to this blog and my other blog (see below), and connect with me on LinkedIn and Twitter.

My two blogs are:

http://tateattorney.com – business, D&O, audit committee, governance, compliance, etc. – previously at http://auditcommitteeupdate.com

Trust, estate, conservatorship, elder and elder abuse, etc. litigation and contentious administrations http://californiaestatetrust.com

David Tate, Esq. (and inactive California CPA) – practicing only as an attorney in California.

Leave a comment